The Accused Becomes the Accuser: Trainee IPS Uday Krishna Reddy Drags Top Cop into Legal Storm Over Torture Allegations
The ongoing legal battle involving trainee IPS officer Uday Krishna Reddy has sent shockwaves through the corridors of power in Telangana. What began as an investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against a fellow female trainee officer has now transformed into a massive controversy involving claims of custodial torture, violation of human rights, and threats of "encounters." In a sensational move, Uday Krishna Reddy has directly targeted Hyderabad's top brass, including CP Sajjanar, in his statement to the magistrate.
Sensational Claims in Court
Uday Krishna Reddy was recently taken into custody by the Attapur police for interrogation. However, when he was produced before the Upparpally court after the custody period, the trainee officer broke down in tears. He alleged that the police treatment towards him was inhumane and violated every legal guideline set by the Supreme Court.
According to his statement, he was interrogated in rooms that did not have CCTV cameras. He claimed that the police deliberately chose secret locations, including the Task Force office, to physically assault and mentally break him. These claims have placed the Attapur police in a very difficult position, as maintaining CCTV records during interrogation is a mandatory requirement.
Allegations Against CP Sajjanar
The most shocking part of Uday's testimony was his allegation against Commissioner of Police (CP) Sajjanar. Uday claimed that while he was at the police station, the CP personally visited and used extremely abusive language against him. He further alleged that the CP threatened to "encounter" his family members if he did not comply.
Reddy’s legal team also questioned the presence of retired ACP Purnachander Rao during the official investigation. They argued that a retired officer has no legal standing to participate in an active criminal interrogation. Furthermore, the lawyers alleged that the police even threatened to kill the advocates representing Uday Krishna Reddy.
Court’s Firm Action
The Magistrate took a serious view of these allegations. The court has issued a show-cause notice to the Attapur Police Inspector, demanding an explanation within two days. The court specifically asked why the interrogation was conducted in areas without CCTV surveillance and sought details regarding the conduct of the officers involved. This move by the court suggests that the police might face legal consequences if the procedural lapses are proven.
Support from a Former CBI Director
Adding weight to Uday Krishna Reddy’s defense, former CBI Director M. Nageswara Rao has stepped in. He wrote a formal letter to DGP CV Anand, raising serious doubts about the integrity of the investigation. Rao questioned how serious charges like Section 376 (Rape) and Section 307 (Attempt to Murder) were added to the case when they were not mentioned in the initial complaint.
Rao has demanded that the case be immediately transferred to the Crime Investigation Department (CID) for a fair and independent probe. He emphasized that the personal involvement of high-ranking officials in the interrogation of a subordinate trainee suggests a bias that could derail justice. He called for a thorough departmental inquiry into the allegations of threats and torture.
A Crisis in the Uniform
This case has highlighted the deep-seated issues within the police department’s internal disciplinary and investigative processes. Uday Krishna Reddy, who is himself an officer in training, is now preparing to file a volley of cases against every policeman involved in his "torture." This rare "IPS vs. Police" showdown has left the department red-faced.
While the original allegations of sexual harassment are yet to be proven, the procedural errors and the alleged high-handedness of the police have shifted the focus of the public and the judiciary. If a trainee IPS officer can allege such brutal treatment, it raises grave concerns about how the common citizen is treated in police custody.
Conclusion
As the two-day deadline for the police explanation nears, all eyes are on the Upparpally court. The outcome of this case will not only determine the future of Uday Krishna Reddy but also set a precedent for how the police handle internal investigations. Whether this is a case of a trainee officer being framed or a genuine investigation marred by procedural errors will only be cleared after a transparent inquiry. For now, the Telangana police force remains in the eye of a legal storm.
